Article #6 Review
This was another challenging discussion on ethics in photojournalism. The article begins with the uproar over a 1989 image from the
Louisville Courier-Journal showing the bloody massacre-style shooting and suicide of an angry employee.
Based on the 1989 incident, the article outlines the six major philosophies that are typical in an ethical debate of this nature:
1.
The Categorical Imperative
At that time there was a great amount of discussion regarding the ownership of automatic weapons and the larger issue of gun control. It contributed to our national debate.
2.
Newsworthiness
The editor believed the image highly newsworthy; that it had to be run.
3.
The Utilitarian Philosophy
The public is served by the image; both sides can identify with this approach. Either the editor who uses this image to confront readers with the result of their choices, or the family members who loose loved ones.
4.
The Golden Mean Position
This suggests that another less gruesome image may have accomplished the same end; that the image was in bad taste and not necessary.
5.
The Veil of Ignorance
Hiding behind public outrage is often a convenient way of not facing the truth.
6.
The Hedonistic Argument
There are those that believe the purpose in running such images is simply to sell papers.
As this article emphasizes, the reaction to an image depends on one's ethical orientation. The photojournalist’s responsibility is to tell the truth with objectivity and newsworthiness. It is the public’s responsibility to speak up and ask for accountability from the press.
The article outlines a recommended Code of Ethics for Photojournalists that should be utilized and agreed up by all members:
1. No photojournalist will intentionally add to a victim’s grief for monetary or award-winning gains.
2. No photojournalist will intentionally violate a person’s privacy for monetary or award winning gains.
3. No photojournalist will intentionally stage or manipulate images.
4. No editor will mandate forced contest participation by a photojournalist.
5. No editor will assign a project that conflict with a photojournalist’s own ethics.
I expressly like the position stated that the goal of photojournalism ethics is not to make right and wrong rules. In dealing with humanity this line seems to always be in motion; like aiming at a moving target. Rather, the goal is to set up acceptable ways of evaluating a photographer’s actions. Then, the ethical arguments may begin.